1992 BMW 520 vs. 1955 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1992 BMW 520 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Jaguar XK (190 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1992 BMW 520. (148 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1992 BMW 520. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 BMW 520 weights approximately 66 kg more than 1955 Jaguar XK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Jaguar XK (285 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 BMW 520. (190 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 1955 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 BMW 520.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW 520 | 1955 Jaguar XK | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | 520 | XK |
Year Released | 1992 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 3441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 285 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 106 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1488 kg | 1422 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1340 mm |