1992 BMW 520 vs. 1967 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1992 BMW 520 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1992 BMW 520. (148 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1992 BMW 520. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 502 kg more than 1992 BMW 520. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 BMW 520 | 1967 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 520 | Calais |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1967 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1488 kg | 1990 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1370 mm |
