1992 BMW 520 vs. 1969 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1992 BMW 520 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 BMW 520 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW 520 (148 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW 520 should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 BMW 520 weights approximately 633 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW 520 | 1969 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | BMW | Zastava |
Model | 520 | 850 K |
Year Released | 1992 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 846 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1488 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1700 mm |