1992 BMW 520 vs. 1970 Zastava 2101
To start off, 1992 BMW 520 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 1,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 BMW 520 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW 520 (148 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1970 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW 520 should accelerate faster than 1970 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 BMW 520 weights approximately 528 kg more than 1970 Zastava 2101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW 520 (190 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1992 BMW 520 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Zastava 2101.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW 520 | 1970 Zastava 2101 | |
Make | BMW | Zastava |
Model | 520 | 2101 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1970 |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 87 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1488 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |