1992 BMW 520 vs. 1975 Mazda Cosmo

To start off, 1992 BMW 520 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,292 cc (2 cylinders), 1975 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW 520 (148 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1975 Mazda Cosmo. (115 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW 520 should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 BMW 520 weights approximately 324 kg more than 1975 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW 520 (190 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda Cosmo. (162 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1992 BMW 520 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda Cosmo.

Compare all specifications:

1992 BMW 520 1975 Mazda Cosmo
Make BMW Mazda
Model 520 Cosmo
Year Released 1992 1975
Body Type Station Wagon Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1990 cc 2292 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 2 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 148 HP 115 HP
Engine RPM 5900 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 190 Nm 162 Nm
Torque RPM 4700 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1488 kg 1164 kg
Vehicle Length 4730 mm 4480 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1340 mm