1992 BMW 520 vs. 1995 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1995 Toyota Celica is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 520. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 520 would be higher. At 1,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 BMW 520 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW 520 (148 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1995 Toyota Celica. (114 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW 520 should accelerate faster than 1995 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 BMW 520 weights approximately 393 kg more than 1995 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 BMW 520 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 BMW 520. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW 520 (190 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Toyota Celica. (154 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1992 BMW 520 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW 520 | 1995 Toyota Celica | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | 520 | Celica |
Year Released | 1992 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1762 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 154 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 78 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1488 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1760 mm |