1992 BMW 520 vs. 1998 Lotus 340 R
To start off, 1998 Lotus 340 R is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 520. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 520 would be higher. At 1,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 BMW 520 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus 340 R (190 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1992 BMW 520. (148 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus 340 R should accelerate faster than 1992 BMW 520. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 BMW 520 weights approximately 813 kg more than 1998 Lotus 340 R.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Lotus 340 R (198 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 BMW 520. (190 Nm). This means 1998 Lotus 340 R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 BMW 520.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW 520 | 1998 Lotus 340 R | |
Make | BMW | Lotus |
Model | 520 | 340 R |
Year Released | 1992 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 198 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1488 kg | 675 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1130 mm |