1992 BMW 520 vs. 1998 Rover 400
To start off, 1998 Rover 400 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 520. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 520 would be higher. At 1,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 BMW 520 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW 520 (148 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1998 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW 520 should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 400.
Because 1992 BMW 520 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 BMW 520. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW 520 (190 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1992 BMW 520 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW 520 | 1998 Rover 400 | |
Make | BMW | Rover |
Model | 520 | 400 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 79 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1410 mm |