1992 BMW 520 vs. 2001 Ford F-650
To start off, 2001 Ford F-650 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 520. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 520 would be higher. At 7,300 cc, 2001 Ford F-650 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW 520 (148 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2001 Ford F-650. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW 520 should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford F-650. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 BMW 520 weights approximately 190 kg more than 2001 Ford F-650. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 BMW 520 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 BMW 520. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford F-650, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford F-650 (1,166 Nm) has 976 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 BMW 520. (190 Nm). This means 2001 Ford F-650 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 BMW 520.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW 520 | 2001 Ford F-650 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 520 | F-650 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2001 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 7300 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 1166 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1488 kg | 1298 kg |