1992 BMW 520 vs. 2002 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2002 Jeep Compass is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 520. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 520 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Compass (210 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1992 BMW 520. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1992 BMW 520. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 BMW 520 weights approximately 82 kg more than 2002 Jeep Compass.
Because 2002 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 BMW 520. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Compass (319 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 BMW 520. (190 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 BMW 520.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW 520 | 2002 Jeep Compass | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 520 | Compass |
Year Released | 1992 | 2002 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 319 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1488 kg | 1406 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1640 mm |