1992 BMW 520 vs. 2002 Skoda Octavia

To start off, 2002 Skoda Octavia is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 520. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 520 would be higher. At 1,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 BMW 520 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 148 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 BMW 520 weights approximately 138 kg more than 2002 Skoda Octavia.

Because 1992 BMW 520 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 BMW 520. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Skoda Octavia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Skoda Octavia (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 BMW 520. (190 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2002 Skoda Octavia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 BMW 520.

Compare all specifications:

1992 BMW 520 2002 Skoda Octavia
Make BMW Skoda
Model 520 Octavia
Year Released 1992 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1990 cc 1781 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 148 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 5900 RPM 5700 RPM
Torque 190 Nm 320 Nm
Torque RPM 4700 RPM 1750 RPM
Engine Bore Size 80.1 mm 81 mm
Engine Stroke Size 66 mm 86.4 mm
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1488 kg 1350 kg
Vehicle Length 4730 mm 4520 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1740 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1460 mm