1992 BMW 520 vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 520. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 520 would be higher. At 1,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 BMW 520 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW 520 (148 HP) has 78 more horse power than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW 520 should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 BMW 520 weights approximately 748 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW 520 (190 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1992 BMW 520 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 BMW 520 | 2004 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | BMW | MCC |
| Model | 520 | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1488 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1520 mm |
