1992 BMW 525 vs. 2002 Jaguar XK8
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XK8 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 525. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 525 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XK8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XK8 (300 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1992 BMW 525. (141 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XK8 should accelerate faster than 1992 BMW 525. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XK8 weights approximately 125 kg more than 1992 BMW 525. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XK8 (420 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 BMW 525. (260 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XK8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 BMW 525.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW 525 | 2002 Jaguar XK8 | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | 525 | XK8 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2002 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 420 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1685 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1300 mm |