1992 BMW 525 vs. 2004 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 525. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 525 would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1992 BMW 525. (141 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1992 BMW 525. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 32 kg more than 1992 BMW 525. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (298 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 BMW 525. (260 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 BMW 525.

Compare all specifications: