1992 BMW 525 vs. 2004 Eagle Vision
To start off, 2004 Eagle Vision is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 525. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 525 would be higher. At 2,698 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Eagle Vision (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1992 BMW 525. (141 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 1992 BMW 525. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Eagle Vision weights approximately 10 kg more than 1992 BMW 525. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 BMW 525 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 BMW 525. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 BMW 525 | 2004 Eagle Vision | |
| Make | BMW | Eagle |
| Model | 525 | Vision |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2498 cc | 2698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1570 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 5320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
