1992 BMW 525 vs. 2007 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2007 Jeep Compass is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 525. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 525 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 BMW 525 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW 525 (141 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2007 Jeep Compass. (138 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW 525 should accelerate faster than 2007 Jeep Compass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Jeep Compass weights approximately 50 kg more than 1992 BMW 525.
Because 2007 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 BMW 525. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jeep Compass (310 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 BMW 525. (260 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2007 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 BMW 525.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW 525 | 2007 Jeep Compass | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 525 | Compass |
Year Released | 1992 | 2007 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 1967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1640 mm |