1992 BMW 525 vs. 2008 Lexus RX
To start off, 2008 Lexus RX is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 525. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 525 would be higher. At 3,311 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Lexus RX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Lexus RX (268 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1992 BMW 525. (141 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 1992 BMW 525. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Lexus RX weights approximately 555 kg more than 1992 BMW 525. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Lexus RX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 BMW 525. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Lexus RX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Lexus RX (287 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 BMW 525. (260 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2008 Lexus RX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 BMW 525.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW 525 | 2008 Lexus RX | |
Make | BMW | Lexus |
Model | 525 | RX |
Year Released | 1992 | 2008 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 3311 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 287 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 2115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1690 mm |