1992 BMW 525 vs. 2011 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2011 Kia Cadenza is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 525. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 525 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Kia Cadenza (269 HP) has 128 more horse power than 1992 BMW 525. (141 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 1992 BMW 525. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 15 kg more than 1992 BMW 525. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 BMW 525 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 BMW 525. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cadenza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW 525 | 2011 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | BMW | Kia |
Model | 525 | Cadenza |
Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 269 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1475 mm |