1992 BMW 538 vs. 1985 Chrysler Laser
To start off, 1992 BMW 538 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 3,795 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 BMW 538 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW 538 (341 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 241 more horse power than 1985 Chrysler Laser. (100 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW 538 should accelerate faster than 1985 Chrysler Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 BMW 538 weights approximately 605 kg more than 1985 Chrysler Laser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 BMW 538 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 BMW 538. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Chrysler Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW 538 (400 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Chrysler Laser. (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1992 BMW 538 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 BMW 538 | 1985 Chrysler Laser | |
| Make | BMW | Chrysler |
| Model | 538 | Laser |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3795 cc | 2499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 341 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 179 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94.6 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 104 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.9:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 1225 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1300 mm |
