1992 BMW 538 vs. 2008 Ford Ka
To start off, 2008 Ford Ka is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 538. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 538 would be higher. At 3,795 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 BMW 538 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 BMW 538 weights approximately 943 kg more than 2008 Ford Ka.
Because 1992 BMW 538 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 BMW 538. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW 538 (400 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 294 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1992 BMW 538 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW 538 | 2008 Ford Ka | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 538 | Ka |
Year Released | 1992 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3795 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 341 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 106 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94.6 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 887 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1730 mm |