1992 BMW 540 vs. 2004 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2004 Dodge Ram is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 540. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 540 would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW 540 (282 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Ram. (235 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW 540 should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Ram. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Ram weights approximately 745 kg more than 1992 BMW 540.
Because 2004 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 BMW 540. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Ram (407 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 BMW 540. (400 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 BMW 540.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW 540 | 2004 Dodge Ram | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | 540 | Ram |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3982 cc | 4703 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 407 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1721 kg | 2466 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 6350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 4080 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.6 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 17.2 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.6 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 132 L |