1992 BMW 540 vs. 2012 Audi Q7
To start off, 2012 Audi Q7 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 540. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 540 would be higher. At 3,982 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 BMW 540 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW 540 (282 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2012 Audi Q7. (272 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW 540 should accelerate faster than 2012 Audi Q7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Audi Q7 weights approximately 634 kg more than 1992 BMW 540.
Because 2012 Audi Q7 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 BMW 540. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi Q7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 400 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW 540 | 2012 Audi Q7 | |
Make | BMW | Audi |
Model | 540 | Q7 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3982 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 272 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1721 kg | 2355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 5088 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1984 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1737 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3002 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.6 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 17.2 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 100 L |