1992 BMW 740 vs. 1964 Holden EH
To start off, 1992 BMW 740 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 3,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 BMW 740 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW 740 (282 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1964 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW 740 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 BMW 740 weights approximately 675 kg more than 1964 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW 740 (400 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EH. (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 1992 BMW 740 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EH.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW 740 | 1964 Holden EH | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | 740 | EH |
Year Released | 1992 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3980 cc | 2928 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2670 mm |