1992 BMW 850 vs. 2003 Mazda 2
To start off, 2003 Mazda 2 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 850 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 BMW 850 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW 850 (295 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 2. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW 850 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 2.
Because 1992 BMW 850 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 BMW 850. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW 850 (447 Nm) has 301 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 2. (146 Nm). This means 1992 BMW 850 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW 850 | 2003 Mazda 2 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 850 | 2 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5500 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 146 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 45 L |