1992 BMW 850 vs. 2005 Citroen Picasso
To start off, 2005 Citroen Picasso is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 850 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 BMW 850 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW 850 (295 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 2005 Citroen Picasso. (94 HP @ 3000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW 850 should accelerate faster than 2005 Citroen Picasso.
Because 1992 BMW 850 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 BMW 850. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen Picasso, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW 850 (447 Nm) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Citroen Picasso. (135 Nm). This means 1992 BMW 850 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Citroen Picasso.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 BMW 850 | 2005 Citroen Picasso | |
| Make | BMW | Citroen |
| Model | 850 | Picasso |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5500 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 295 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Torque | 447 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Top Speed | 249 km/hour | 171 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 55 L |
