1992 BMW M3 vs. 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1992 BMW M3 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 BMW M3 weights approximately 165 kg more than 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 BMW M3 | 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
| Make | BMW | Studebaker |
| Model | M3 | Sky Hawk |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2990 cc | 2779 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2980 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 68 L |
