1992 BMW M3 vs. 1969 Saab 99
To start off, 1992 BMW M3 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Saab 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Saab 99 would be higher. At 2,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW M3 (282 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 1969 Saab 99. (79 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1969 Saab 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 BMW M3 weights approximately 395 kg more than 1969 Saab 99. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Saab 99, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW M3 (320 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Saab 99. (128 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1992 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Saab 99.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW M3 | 1969 Saab 99 | |
Make | BMW | Saab |
Model | M3 | 99 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2990 cc | 1707 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 83.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.8 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 54 L |