1992 BMW M3 vs. 1983 Lancia Beta
To start off, 1992 BMW M3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Lancia Beta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Lancia Beta would be higher. At 2,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW M3 (282 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 1983 Lancia Beta. (82 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1983 Lancia Beta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 BMW M3 weights approximately 463 kg more than 1983 Lancia Beta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Lancia Beta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW M3 (320 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Lancia Beta. (108 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1992 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Lancia Beta.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW M3 | 1983 Lancia Beta | |
Make | BMW | Lancia |
Model | M3 | Beta |
Year Released | 1992 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2990 cc | 1367 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.8 mm | 71.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 8.9:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1002 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2360 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 45 L |