1992 BMW M3 vs. 2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser

To start off, 2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW M3 (282 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser. (200 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser weights approximately 99 kg more than 1992 BMW M3.

Because 1992 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW M3 (320 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser. (271 Nm). This means 1992 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser.

Compare all specifications: