1992 BMW M3 vs. 2000 Seat Arosa

To start off, 2000 Seat Arosa is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW M3 (282 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 2000 Seat Arosa. (123 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Seat Arosa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 BMW M3 weights approximately 176 kg more than 2000 Seat Arosa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1992 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW M3 (320 Nm) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Seat Arosa. (117 Nm). This means 1992 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Seat Arosa.

Compare all specifications: