1992 BMW M3 vs. 2000 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2000 Subaru Forester is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Subaru Forester weights approximately 47 kg more than 1992 BMW M3.
Because 2000 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW M3 (320 Nm) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Subaru Forester. (186 Nm). This means 1992 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Subaru Forester.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW M3 | 2000 Subaru Forester | |
Make | BMW | Subaru |
Model | M3 | Forester |
Year Released | 1992 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2990 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 186 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 91.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.8 mm | 74.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1512 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2680 mm |