1992 BMW M3 vs. 2002 Cadillac XLR

To start off, 2002 Cadillac XLR is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW M3 would be higher. At 4,570 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac XLR (316 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1992 BMW M3. (282 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1992 BMW M3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 189 kg more than 1992 BMW M3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac XLR (407 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 BMW M3. (320 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 BMW M3. 2002 Cadillac XLR has automatic transmission and 1992 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 1992 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Cadillac XLR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1992 BMW M3 2002 Cadillac XLR
Make BMW Cadillac
Model M3 XLR
Year Released 1992 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2990 cc 4570 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 282 HP 316 HP
Engine RPM 7000 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 320 Nm 407 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 4400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 93 mm
Engine Stroke Size 85.8 mm 84 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.8:1 10.5:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Vehicle Weight 1465 kg 1654 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 4520 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1290 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2690 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 L 68 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]