1992 BMW M3 vs. 2002 Ford Ka
To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW M3 (282 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ka. (135 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 BMW M3 weights approximately 329 kg more than 2002 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW M3 (320 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ka. (175 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1992 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 BMW M3 | 2002 Ford Ka | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | M3 | Ka |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2990 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 135 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 82.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85.8 mm | 75.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1136 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 42 L |
