1992 BMW M3 vs. 2002 Hyundai Matrix
To start off, 2002 Hyundai Matrix is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW M3 (282 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 2002 Hyundai Matrix. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2002 Hyundai Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 BMW M3 weights approximately 240 kg more than 2002 Hyundai Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Hyundai Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW M3 (320 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Hyundai Matrix. (144 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1992 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Hyundai Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW M3 | 2002 Hyundai Matrix | |
Make | BMW | Hyundai |
Model | M3 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1992 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2990 cc | 1604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.8 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 72 L |