1992 BMW M3 vs. 2004 Isuzu Axiom
To start off, 2004 Isuzu Axiom is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Axiom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW M3 (282 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2004 Isuzu Axiom. (250 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Isuzu Axiom. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Axiom weights approximately 458 kg more than 1992 BMW M3.
Because 2004 Isuzu Axiom is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Axiom will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu Axiom (334 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 BMW M3. (320 Nm). This means 2004 Isuzu Axiom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW M3 | 2004 Isuzu Axiom | |
Make | BMW | Isuzu |
Model | M3 | Axiom |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2990 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 334 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.8 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1923 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 74 L |