1992 BMW M3 vs. 2005 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW M3 (282 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (110 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 BMW M3 weights approximately 190 kg more than 2005 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW M3 (320 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1992 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW M3 | 2005 Ford Ranger | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | M3 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2990 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 257 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1275 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 45 L |