1992 BMW M3 vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz C

To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW M3 (282 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2005 Mercedes-Benz C. (189 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercedes-Benz C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 BMW M3 weights approximately 61 kg more than 2005 Mercedes-Benz C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW M3 (320 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercedes-Benz C. (260 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1992 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercedes-Benz C. 2005 Mercedes-Benz C has automatic transmission and 1992 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 1992 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Mercedes-Benz C will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1992 BMW M3 2005 Mercedes-Benz C
Make BMW Mercedes-Benz
Model M3 C
Year Released 1992 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2990 cc 1796 cc
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 282 HP 189 HP
Engine RPM 7000 RPM 4200 RPM
Torque 320 Nm 260 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 82 mm
Engine Stroke Size 85.8 mm 85 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.8:1 8.7:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Vehicle Weight 1465 kg 1404 kg
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2720 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 L 62 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]