1992 BMW M3 vs. 2009 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2009 Holden Colorado is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW M3 (282 HP) has 72 more horse power than 2009 Holden Colorado. (210 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Colorado.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW M3 (320 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Colorado. (313 Nm). This means 1992 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 BMW M3 | 2009 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | BMW | Holden |
| Model | M3 | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2990 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 210 HP |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 313 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
