1992 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 1997 Buick LeSabre
To start off, 1997 Buick LeSabre is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Bristol Beaufighter weights approximately 260 kg more than 1997 Buick LeSabre.
Because 1992 Bristol Beaufighter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Bristol Beaufighter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Buick LeSabre, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Bristol Beaufighter | 1997 Buick LeSabre | |
Make | Bristol | Buick |
Model | Beaufighter | LeSabre |
Year Released | 1992 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 202 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2820 mm |