1992 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Bristol Beaufighter weights approximately 232 kg more than 2004 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Bristol Beaufighter | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | Beaufighter | Mustang |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 260 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1518 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2630 mm |