1992 Bugatti EB 110 vs. 1968 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1992 Bugatti EB 110 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Bugatti EB 110 (560 HP) has 225 more horse power than 1968 Ford Mustang. (335 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Bugatti EB 110 should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Mustang.
Because 1992 Bugatti EB 110 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Bugatti EB 110 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Bugatti EB 110 (612 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Ford Mustang. (597 Nm). This means 1992 Bugatti EB 110 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Bugatti EB 110 | 1968 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Bugatti | Ford |
| Model | EB 110 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1968 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3498 cc | 7010 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 560 HP | 335 HP |
| Torque | 612 Nm | 597 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.4 mm | 105 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 57.2 mm | 101.2 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 10.6:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2750 mm |
