1992 Bugatti EB 110 vs. 2003 Daewoo Rezzo
To start off, 2003 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Bugatti EB 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Bugatti EB 110 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 Bugatti EB 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Bugatti EB 110 (650 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 543 more horse power than 2003 Daewoo Rezzo. (107 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Bugatti EB 110 should accelerate faster than 2003 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Bugatti EB 110 weights approximately 152 kg more than 2003 Daewoo Rezzo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Bugatti EB 110 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Daewoo Rezzo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Bugatti EB 110 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Bugatti EB 110 (637 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 493 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Daewoo Rezzo. (144 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1992 Bugatti EB 110 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Daewoo Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Bugatti EB 110 | 2003 Daewoo Rezzo | |
Make | Bugatti | Daewoo |
Model | EB 110 | Rezzo |
Year Released | 1992 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 650 HP | 107 HP |
Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 637 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 56.6 mm | 81.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 120 L | 60 L |