1992 Bugatti EB 110 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Bugatti EB 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Bugatti EB 110 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Bugatti EB 110 (650 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 391 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac CTS. (259 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Bugatti EB 110 should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac CTS.
Because 1992 Bugatti EB 110 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Bugatti EB 110 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Bugatti EB 110 (637 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 384 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac CTS. (253 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1992 Bugatti EB 110 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Bugatti EB 110 | 2009 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Bugatti | Cadillac |
| Model | EB 110 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3498 cc | 3564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 650 HP | 259 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 637 Nm | 253 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 56.6 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 10.2:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
