1992 Bugatti EB 110 vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Bugatti EB 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Bugatti EB 110 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Bugatti EB 110 (560 HP) has 383 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Bugatti EB 110 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Because 1992 Bugatti EB 110 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Bugatti EB 110 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Bugatti EB 110 (612 Nm) has 428 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm). This means 1992 Bugatti EB 110 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Bugatti EB 110 | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Bugatti | Ford |
| Model | EB 110 | E-350 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Van |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3498 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 560 HP | 177 HP |
| Torque | 612 Nm | 184 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4437 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2619 mm |
