1992 Bugatti EB 110 vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Bugatti EB 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Bugatti EB 110 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 Bugatti EB 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Bugatti EB 110 (650 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 518 more horse power than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (132 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Bugatti EB 110 should accelerate faster than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Because 1992 Bugatti EB 110 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Toyota Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Bugatti EB 110 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Bugatti EB 110 (637 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 464 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1992 Bugatti EB 110 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Bugatti EB 110 | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Bugatti | Toyota |
| Model | EB 110 | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3498 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 650 HP | 132 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 637 Nm | 173 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4366 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2601 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 120 L | 50 L |
