1992 Buick Regal vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Buick Regal would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 25 more horse power than 1992 Buick Regal. (170 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1992 Buick Regal.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Buick Regal (298 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 1992 Buick Regal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Buick Regal | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Buick | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Regal | FTO |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 195 HP |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 202 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1300 mm |
