1992 Buick Regal vs. 2004 Mazda 3
To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Buick Regal would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Buick Regal (170 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 3. (144 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Buick Regal weights approximately 117 kg more than 2004 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Buick Regal (298 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 3. (184 Nm). This means 1992 Buick Regal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Buick Regal | 2004 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | Regal | 3 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 144 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 184 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1223 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2760 mm |