1992 Buick Regal vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Buick Regal would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cadenza (201 HP) has 31 more horse power than 1992 Buick Regal. (170 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 1992 Buick Regal. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 235 kg more than 1992 Buick Regal. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Buick Regal | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | Buick | Kia |
Model | Regal | Cadenza |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 201 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2845 mm |