1992 Buick Riviera vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz CLC
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz CLC is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Buick Riviera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Buick Riviera would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Buick Riviera is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Buick Riviera weights approximately 55 kg more than 2010 Mercedes-Benz CLC.
Because 2010 Mercedes-Benz CLC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Mercedes-Benz CLC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Buick Riviera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Buick Riviera | 2010 Mercedes-Benz CLC | |
Make | Buick | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Riviera | CLC |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3800 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 181 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1465 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2720 mm |