1992 Buick Riviera vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Buick Riviera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Buick Riviera would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Buick Riviera is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 433 kg more than 1992 Buick Riviera.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Buick Riviera. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Buick Riviera | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Buick | Cadillac |
Model | Riviera | CTS |
Year Released | 1992 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3800 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 314 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1953 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4877 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1842 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2880 mm |